310 research outputs found

    Comparison of laboratory and daily-life gait speed assessment during on and off states in parkinsonā€™s disease

    Get PDF
    Accurate assessment of Parkinsonā€™s disease (PD) ON and OFF states in the usual environment is essential for tailoring optimal treatments. Wearables facilitate measurements of gait in novel and unsupervised environments; however, differences between unsupervised and in-laboratory measures have been reported in PD. We aimed to investigate whether unsupervised gait speed discriminates medication states and which supervised tests most accurately represent home perfor-mance. In-lab gait speeds from different gait tasks were compared to home speeds of 27 PD patients at ON and OFF states using inertial sensors. Daily gait speed distribution was expressed in percentiles and walking bout (WB) length. Gait speeds differentiated ON and OFF states in the lab and the home. When comparing lab with home performance, ON assessments in the lab showed moderate-to-high correlations with faster gait speeds in unsupervised environment (r = 0.69; p < 0.001), associated with long WB. OFF gait assessments in the lab showed moderate correlation values with slow gait speeds during OFF state at home (r = 0.56; p = 0.004), associated with short WB. In-lab and daily assessments of gait speed with wearables capture additional integrative aspects of PD, reflecting different aspects of mobility. Unsupervised assessment using wearables adds complementary information to the clinical assessment of motor fluctuations in PD.This research was funded by Keep Control from the EUā€™s Horizon 2020 (H2020) research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie (MSCA-ITN-ETN), grant number 721577. No other financial support and funding for the preceding twelve months are applied

    Potential Markers of Progression in Idiopathic Parkinsonā€™s Disease Derived From Assessment of Circular Gait With a Single Body-Fixed-Sensor: A 5 Year Longitudinal Study

    Get PDF
    Background and Aim: Development of objective, reliable and easy-to-use methods to obtain progression markers of Parkinsonā€™s disease (PD) is required to evaluate interventions and to advance research in PD. This study aimed to provide quantitative markers of progression in idiopathic PD from the assessment of circular gait (walking in circles) with a single body-fixed inertial sensor placed on the lower back.Methods: The assessments were performed every 6 months over a (up to) 5 years period for 22 patients in early-stage PD, 27 patients in middle-stage PD and 25 healthy controls (HC). Longitudinal changes of 24 gait features extracted from accelerometry were compared between PD groups and HCs with generalized estimating equations (GEE) analysis, accounting for gait speed, age and levodopa medication state confounders when required.Results: Five gait features indicated progressive worsening in early stages of PD: number of steps, total duration and harmonic ratios calculated from vertical (VT), medio-lateral (ML), and anterior-posterior (AP) accelerations. For middle stages of PD, three gait features were identified as potential progression markers: stride time variability, and stride regularity from VT and AP acceleration.Conclusion: Faster progressive worsening of gait features in early and middle stages of PD relative to healthy controls over 5 years confirmed the potential of accelerometry-based assessments as quantitative progression markers in early and middle stages of the disease. The difference in significant parameters between both PD groups suggests that distinct domains of gait deteriorate in these PD stages. We conclude that instrumented circular walking assessment is a practical and useful tool in the assessment of PD progression that may have relevant potential to be implemented in clinical trials and even clinical routine, particularly in a developing digital era

    Toward a regulatory qualification of real-world mobility performance biomarkers in Parkinsonā€™s patients using Digital Mobility Outcomes

    Get PDF
    Wearable inertial sensors can be used to monitor mobility in real-world settings over extended periods. Although these technologies are widely used in human movement research, they have not yet been qualified by drug regulatory agencies for their use in regulatory drug trials. This is because the first generation of these sensors was unreliable when used on slow-walking subjects. However, intense research in this area is now offering a new generation of algorithms to quantify Digital Mobility Outcomes so accurate they may be considered as biomarkers in regulatory drug trials. This perspective paper summarises the work in the Mobilise-D consortium around the regulatory qualification of the use of wearable sensors to quantify real-world mobility performance in patients affected by Parkinsonā€™s Disease. The paper describes the qualification strategy and both the technical and clinical validation plans, which have recently received highly supportive qualification advice from the European Medicines Agency. The scope is to provide detailed guidance for the preparation of similar qualification submissions to broaden the use of real-world mobility assessment in regulatory drug trials

    Dual vs. Single Tasking During Circular Walking: What Better Reflects Progression in Parkinson's Disease?

    Get PDF
    Background and Aim: Reliable, valid and sensitive measures of dual-task-associated impairments in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) may reveal progressive deficits unnoticed under single-task walking. The aim of this study was to quantitatively identify markers of progressive gait deficits in idiopathic PD while walking over a circular trajectory condition in single-task walking and in different dual-task conditions: (1) circular walking while checking boxes on a paper sheet as fast as possible and (2) circular walking while performing subtraction of 7 as fast as possible. In addition, we aimed to study the added value of dual-tasking assessment over single (circular) walking task assessment in the study of PD progression.Methods: The assessments were performed every 6 months over a (up to) 5 years period for 22 patients in early-stage PD, 27 patients in middle-stage PD and 25 healthy controls (HC). Longitudinal changes of 27 gait features extracted from accelerometry were compared between PD groups and HCs using generalized estimating equations analysis, accounting for gait speed, age, and levodopa medication state confounders when required. In addition, dual-task-interference with gait and cognitive performance was assessed, as well as their combination.Results: The results support the validity and robustness of some of the gait features already identified in our previous work as progression markers of the disease in single-task circular walking. However, fewer gait features from dual-task than from single-task assessments were identified as markers of progression in PD. Moreover, we did not clearly identify progressive worsening of dual-task-interference in patients with PD, although some group differences between early and middle stages of PD vs. the control group were observed for dual-task interference with the gait task and with the concurrent tasks.Conclusions: Overall, the results showed that dual-tasking did not have added value in the study of PD progression from circular gait assessments. Our analyses suggest that, while single-task walking might be sensitive enough, dual-tasking may introduce additional (error) variance to the data and may represent complex composite measures of cognitive and motor performance

    Clinical parameters and tools for home-based assessment of Parkinsonā€™s disease: results from a Delphi study

    Get PDF
    Ā© 2015 ā€“ IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved. This article is published online with Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License.Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with fluctuating symptoms. To aid the development of a system to evaluate people with PD (PwP) at home (SENSE-PARK system) there was a need to define parameters and tools to be applied in the assessment of 6 domains: gait, bradykinesia/hypokinesia, tremor, sleep, balance and cognition. Objective: To identify relevant parameters and assessment tools of the 6 domains, from the perspective of PwP, caregivers and movement disorders specialists. Methods: A 2-round Delphi study was conducted to select a core of parameters and assessment tools to be applied. This process included PwP, caregivers and movement disorders specialists. Results: Two hundred and thirty-three PwP, caregivers and physicians completed the first round questionnaire, and 50 the second. Results allowed the identification of parameters and assessment tools to be added to the SENSE-PARK system. The most consensual parameters were: Falls and Near Falls; Capability to Perform Activities of Daily Living; Interference with Activities of Daily Living; Capability to Process Tasks; and Capability to Recall and Retrieve Information. The most cited assessment strategies included Walkers; the Evaluation of Performance Doing Fine Motor Movements; Capability to Eat; Assessment of Sleep Quality; Identification of Circumstances and Triggers for Loose of Balance and Memory Assessment. Conclusions: An agreed set of measuring parameters, tests, tools and devices was achieved to be part of a system to evaluate PwP at home. A pattern of different perspectives was identified for each stakeholder.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Altered Serum IgG Levels to a-Synuclein in Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Alzheimerā€™s Disease.

    Get PDF
    Natural self-reactive antibodies in the peripheral blood may play a considerable role in the control of potentially toxic proteins that may otherwise accumulate in the aging brain. The significance of serum antibodies reactive against asynuclein is not well known. We explored serum IgG levels to monomeric a-synuclein in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimerā€™s disease (AD) with a novel and validated highly sensitive ELISA assay. Antibody levels revealed stark differences in patients compared to healthy subjects and were dependent on diagnosis, disease duration and age. Anti-asynuclein IgG levels were increased in both patient groups, but in early DLB to a much greater extent than in AD. Increased antibody levels were most evident in younger patients, while with advanced age relatively low levels were observed, similar to healthy individuals, exhibiting stable antibody levels independent of age. Our data show the presence of differentially altered IgG levels against a-synuclein in DLB and AD, which may relate to a disturbed a-synuclein homeostasis triggered by the disease process. These observations may foster the development of novel, possibly preclinical biomarkers and immunotherapeutic strategies that target a-synuclein in neurodegenerative disease.Fil: Koehler, Niklas. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY;Fil: Stransky, Elke. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY;Fil: Shing, Mona. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY;Fil: Gaertner, Susanne. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY;Fil: Meyer, Mirjam. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY;Fil: Schreitmueller, Brigitte. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY;Fil: Leyhe, Thomas. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY;Fil: Laske, Cristoph. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY;Fil: Maetzler, Walter. Department of Neurodegeneration. HERTIE INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL BRAIN RESEARCH;Fil: Kahle, Philipp. FUNCTIONAL NEUROGENETICS. HERTIE INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL;Fil: Celej, Maria Soleda. MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUTE FOR BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; Consejo Nacional de Invest.cientif.y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnol.conicet - Cordoba. Centro de Invest.en Qca.biol.de Cordoba (p);Fil: Jovin, Thomas M.. MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUTE FOR BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY;Fil: Fallgatter, Andreas. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY;Fil: Batra, Anil. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY;Fil: Buchkremer, Gherard. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY;Fil: Schott, Klauss. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY;Fil: Richartz-Salzburger, Elke. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. EBERHARD-KARLS-UNIVERSITY

    Protocol for PD SENSORS:Parkinsonā€™s Diseaseā€ÆSymptom Evaluation in a Naturalistic Setting producing Outcomesā€ÆmeasuResā€Æusing SPHERE technology. An observational feasibility study ofā€Æmulti-modal multi-sensor technologyā€Ætoā€Æmeasureā€Æsymptoms and activities of daily living in Parkinsonā€™s disease

    Get PDF
    Introduction The impact of disease-modifying agents on disease progression in Parkinsonā€™s disease is largely assessed in clinical trials using clinical rating scales. These scales have drawbacks in terms of their ability to capture the fluctuating nature of symptoms while living in a naturalistic environment. The SPHERE (Sensor Platform for HEalthcare in a Residential Environment) project has designed a multi-sensor platform with multimodal devices designed to allow continuous, relatively inexpensive, unobtrusive sensing of motor, non-motor and activities of daily living metrics in a home or a home-like environment. The aim of this study is to evaluate how the SPHERE technology can measure aspects of Parkinsonā€™s disease.Methods and analysis This is a small-scale feasibility and acceptability study during which 12 pairs of participants (comprising a person with Parkinsonā€™s and a healthy control participant) will stay and live freely for 5 days in a home-like environment embedded with SPHERE technology including environmental, appliance monitoring, wrist-worn accelerometry and camera sensors. These data will be collected alongside clinical rating scales, participant diary entries and expert clinician annotations of colour video images. Machine learning will be used to look for a signal to discriminate between Parkinsonā€™s disease and control, and between Parkinsonā€™s disease symptoms ā€˜onā€™ and ā€˜offā€™ medications. Additional outcome measures including bradykinesia, activity level, sleep parameters and some activities of daily living will be explored. Acceptability of the technology will be evaluated qualitatively using semi-structured interviews.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been given to commence this study; the results will be disseminated as widely as appropriate

    Biomarker candidates of neurodegeneration in Parkinsonā€™s disease for the evaluation of disease-modifying therapeutics

    Get PDF
    Reliable biomarkers that can be used for early diagnosis and tracking disease progression are the cornerstone of the development of disease-modifying treatments for Parkinsonā€™s disease (PD). The German Society of Experimental and Clinical Neurotherapeutics (GESENT) has convened a Working Group to review the current status of proposed biomarkers of neurodegeneration according to the following criteria and to develop a consensus statement on biomarker candidates for evaluation of disease-modifying therapeutics in PD. The criteria proposed are that the biomarker should be linked to fundamental features of PD neuropathology and mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration in PD, should be correlated to disease progression assessed by clinical rating scales, should monitor the actual disease status, should be pre-clinically validated, and confirmed by at least two independent studies conducted by qualified investigators with the results published in peer-reviewed journals. To date, available data have not yet revealed one reliable biomarker to detect early neurodegeneration in PD and to detect and monitor effects of drug candidates on the disease process, but some promising biomarker candidates, such as antibodies against neuromelanin, pathological forms of Ī±-synuclein, DJ-1, and patterns of gene expression, metabolomic and protein profiling exist. Almost all of the biomarker candidates were not investigated in relation to effects of treatment, validated in experimental models of PD and confirmed in independent studies
    • ā€¦
    corecore